Scan barcode
godsgayearth's review against another edition
Damn. I may have waited too long to read it, but I definitely liked In the Company of a Courtesan better. This won’t keep me from reading Dunant’s later works though.
kyra_d's review against another edition
dark
emotional
hopeful
informative
reflective
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.75
chloeam3103's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
emotional
informative
tense
slow-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? Character
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? It's complicated
- Diverse cast of characters? Yes
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
4.5
Graphic: Religious bigotry, Pregnancy, and Abandonment
Moderate: Adult/minor relationship, Body horror, Cancer, Homophobia, Infidelity, Misogyny, Racism, Self harm, Sexual content, Slavery, Terminal illness, Blood, and Outing
Minor: Body shaming, Child death, Mental illness, Miscarriage, Sexual violence, Torture, Violence, Vomit, War, and Pandemic/Epidemic
kdroesler's review against another edition
3.0
Very similar to I, Mona Lisa. Almost to the point that at times I felt like I was reading the same book. The historical aspect is not as detailed as in I, Mona Lisa but the overall story was very good.
sarah_l_p's review against another edition
adventurous
challenging
mysterious
medium-paced
- Plot- or character-driven? A mix
- Strong character development? Yes
- Loveable characters? No
- Diverse cast of characters? No
- Flaws of characters a main focus? Yes
3.5
mbirdface's review against another edition
4.0
Hm, I seem to disagree with many of the reviews.
What I enjoyed: the long (tedious?) descriptions of art, fashion, what-have-you, pointless little moments. I also knew nothing of this time period or of Florence, so it made me feel like I was reading something vaguely educational.
What I disliked: the romance, the unrealistic friendships. Strangely, I would have been content if this novel had scarcely any plot at all, and just rambled about historical context and details of everyday life.
What I enjoyed: the long (tedious?) descriptions of art, fashion, what-have-you, pointless little moments. I also knew nothing of this time period or of Florence, so it made me feel like I was reading something vaguely educational.
What I disliked: the romance, the unrealistic friendships. Strangely, I would have been content if this novel had scarcely any plot at all, and just rambled about historical context and details of everyday life.
catladymcgee's review against another edition
3.0
Thank God for historical romance novels that neatly coincide with my Art History course so I can feel simultaneously erudite and smutty.
That being said, I truly enjoyed this book. Admittedly, the first third failed to peak a page-turning fervor, but I was quick to forget the author's failure to quickly draw me in once the plot further blossomed. Because, once I was hooked, I was hook. After all, the slow beginning aside, what was there to dislike about the plot? Sodomy, adultery, betrayal, death, torture, court intrigue... I could expound, but I think you get the picture.
Oh, and the art. Oh my, the art. While some have (understandably) commented that the artistic references weighed down the plot, I just happen to be fresh from 1) completing my Intro to Art History course, thus rendering familiar names like Botticelli and Brunelleschi and 2) watching a four-part documentary on the Medici dynasty, a project of which dedicated an entire hour to the purging of Florence under the reign of the crazy, quasi-prophetic Savonarola.
Now, if I had read this book even two months earlier, I would likely be reporting a different reaction, but the fates seemed to align in order to allow me maximum enjoyment from the book.
That being said, my overall rating is 3.5: I just couldn't quite overcome the effort required to trudge through the first third of the book.
That being said, I truly enjoyed this book. Admittedly, the first third failed to peak a page-turning fervor, but I was quick to forget the author's failure to quickly draw me in once the plot further blossomed. Because, once I was hooked, I was hook. After all, the slow beginning aside, what was there to dislike about the plot? Sodomy, adultery, betrayal, death, torture, court intrigue... I could expound, but I think you get the picture.
Oh, and the art. Oh my, the art. While some have (understandably) commented that the artistic references weighed down the plot, I just happen to be fresh from 1) completing my Intro to Art History course, thus rendering familiar names like Botticelli and Brunelleschi and 2) watching a four-part documentary on the Medici dynasty, a project of which dedicated an entire hour to the purging of Florence under the reign of the crazy, quasi-prophetic Savonarola.
Now, if I had read this book even two months earlier, I would likely be reporting a different reaction, but the fates seemed to align in order to allow me maximum enjoyment from the book.
That being said, my overall rating is 3.5: I just couldn't quite overcome the effort required to trudge through the first third of the book.
mlroth's review against another edition
3.0
Parts of this book were exciting, page turning. And other parts were so boring I found myself skimming them. An unusual main character, some interesting plot twists, well researched art and religious history. But still felt mediocre to me.